Argumentative Essay: A Change in Education System Essay

The Philippines raisingal scheme is undergoing a deformnup change which follows the foreign directional organisation. The K-12 system is the system used by the United States and other countries. The K-12 system is started by the Aquino Administration. The government result hit two year plus Kindergarten. Many people deal that implementing the program in the Philippines impart be insignifi shadowert and unnecessary but others think that it would mitigate the countrys educational system and the country as a whole. I agree with the K-12 system that will help educatees spread over a better flavor education and will give them more job opportunities, especi exclusivelyy abroad.There are many arguments regarding the K-12 implementation. I restrain chosen 3 arguments to talk about. First, parents are not pecuniaryly stabled. silver would hinder the implementation of the system. The parents would pay two more years for the education of their children. Their children woul d learn more and gain more knowledge for those additional two year of education. The bullion that the parents pay will be put into respectable use for their childrens future. But the parents would be snuff iting a cover more than they expected for good feel education. The parents are not watchful to pay for two more years of education. The plan of the administration was introductory than expected. And some parents are not happy with this plan because of financial problems.Second, improve the prime(a) education we devote in our country. The Philippines need good quality education because we have a poor education system. The K-12 system will help the country to have a higher standard of education the government can add more to the curriculum. The advancement of having an improved quality education would lead to an earlier success in a students life. It may take him/ her long to finish high school but he/ she gained more knowledge than the students who wide-awake in 10 years . The student would take extended to finish his/ her canonic education but will be more prepared. It is enough that the student is prepared when reaching the age of 18 after finishing the K-12. Their minds will be mature enough to think better than what is expected of them if calibrated at the age of 16.Lastly, prepare the student for break down after graduating. non all students who graduated will mechanically be sent to a university for college. Some students prepare themselves to look for a job for the sake of having money to study in college while some are forced to work for the sake of helping the family. The students who have well-bred the 12 year system will automatically be recognized professionals because we are following the international education standard. This will be good for our country. But, the student has not accomplished his/ her schooling. He/ she needs to be sent off to college because completing all levels of education would mean a better job in or out of the country. A student can earn more if he/ she finishes college and finds a good job.Based on the arguments stated, either good or bad, the K-12 system has a good point. I agree that the parents will spend more money for good education but their money wint be put into waste. Their children will experience good quality education that will good for their future. Of courseparents want whats best(p) for their children in the quality of education because one day, their children will be the ones assisting them when they grow old. The old education system is done for 10 years and it can stress a students life if the system should have been 12 years. We all know that some people have financial problems that they go to work after high school. 12 years is longer than the 10 year system but the graduate students of the K-12 will automatically be recognized professionals because we are following the international education standard. The K-12 system will help students get a better job abroad because of the quality education that follows the international education standard.