Resolution Difference Between Conflict And Competition - 825 Words

Resolution: Difference Between Conflict And Competition (Essay Sample) Content: Conflict ResolutionName:Institution Affiliation:Conflict ResolutionConflict and CompetitionThere are several distinctive differences between conflict and competition. First, conflict is a disagreement between two parties and may last for a duration of time involving violence and personalized accord. On the other hand, competition is a peaceful conflict of interest that is nonviolence and involves a contest for resources and achieving the best. The main difference that stands out between conflict and competition is that conflict the is short lived and includes hard feelings between two parties while game is continuous in nature and participants contest for the top shot peacefully. According to max weber, conflict and competition are two different social interaction method where the former involves a disagreement between two players in the market rather than contesting for the goal. On the other hand, the latter, competition, is a consecutive match for the common goal r ather than direct accord between the two players. In most cases, its hard to distinguish between the two terms since competition sometimes goes overboard to create unhealthy conflict (Somech et al., 2009). Moreover, completion regards rules and regulations in the interaction while conflict has no regard for any rules or procedures.Healthy CompetitionCompetition involves a rivalry between two players to achieve the top award or a goal. Healthy competition occurs when the rivalry motivates people to do better and reach their aims. Using a situation where two companies are competing to sell product A on the market, healthy competition is when both companies tries they best to outsmart the other and sell more products in the market. In this process, no harm or violence is directed to either company, and they lead to high-quality goods and innovative ideas. Besides, healthy competition leads to other positive advantages such as improvement in standards of living; customers have a wide ch oice of goods and creation of jobs and innovative ideas. According to Wallensteen (2015), a healthy competition leads to the rival firms to be motivated and work hard to achieve the top goal. Healthy competition is an important aspect of a business environment since it drives the organization to remain competitive and observes the rival firms strategies such supply chain management, pricing strategy and the quantity of goods produced. Healthy competition promotes teamwork, success and continues motivation to perform better.Unhealthy CompetitionCompetition can results into conflict if the participants involved dont follow the rules and guidelines and use violence in the contest for resources or market. Unhealthy competition is risky and brings complications in the business environment. An example of a situation that involves unhealthy competition is when two competing firms start to engage in dishonest dealings that jeopardize chances of success or achieving the goal of the other par ticipant. When two companies are competing to sell a commodity in the market, firm A may engage in an unhealthy competition leading to conflict by lowering prices to disadvantage the other, mobilizing the customers not to buy goods from the other company and other unfair or unorthodox business activities. A situation where two companies competing for the same market ignores rules, engage in dishonest dealings and use violence to win, the completion is unhealthy and requires conflict resolution.Conflict ResolutionAccording to Ury (2010), in The walk from no to yes, he argues that the easiest method to resolve a conflict is to involve a neutral third party that helps the two participants look at the bigger picture and walk to the balcony for a fresh perspective of the dispute. In a situation where two companies engage in unhealthy competition and start conflicting for market and resources, mediation is the best method to resolve the conflict. Appointment of a neutral third party shoul d be used to ensure the two companies conflicting resolve the matter peacefully and set rules and guidelines that will lead to healthy competition again. In most cases, government officials resolve the conflict by implementing policies that ensure free and fair completion such as setting price ceiling and floors, reduction of monopolies and protecting consumer exploitations. Besides, both negotiati...